Discussion:
scan microfiche to computer
(too old to reply)
William Kirk
2007-10-09 17:16:10 UTC
Permalink
I have found an easy way to convert microfiches of parish registers etc. to
files that can be viewed on a PC. I thought I would share my experience as
it has taken me a while to work out how to do it! You cannot do it easily or
well with an ordinary scanner, but it works well with a high resolution
scanner that has the option of scanning negatives and transparencies and
provides light from above. I use an Epson Perfection V700, which costs just
over 300 pounds in the UK, but the V500 which costs about 175 pounds is
probably as good. The fiches do not fit any of the supplied negative
holders, but they can be placed directly on the platen. I use the "Epson
Scan" software which comes with the scanner. I scan for "B/W negative file"
at 8-bit grey scale and 6400 dpi. I save as jpeg at compression level 16 to
make the files reasonably small. The quality is still very good. I write the
files to a DVD for storage.

Some programs have difficulties with files over 30,000 pixels in any
direction (e.g. many versions of Adobe Photoshop), so I only scan a strip of
about 6 pages on the microfiche to each file. This gives about 12 files for
each microfiche. The Epson Scan software allows multiple selections from a
microfiche that are then scanned automatically in turn and the series of
files is automatically numbered. The scanning process then takes about 8
minutes per microfiche because of the high resolution, but you can do
something else meanwhile.

The advantages are:
- I do not need a microfiche reader
- I can have backups
- Images can be enhanced considerably to increase legibility
- If your eyesight is poor you can enlarge as necessary
- The image contrast is very much better than on most microfiche readers
- I can select and print out relevant material such as parish register
entries
- When microfiche readers die out in a few years time you will still be able
to read the microfiches!

Genealogical societies could convert their microfiches to DVDs this way.

Remember to observe relevant copyright rules!

William
Lars Erik Bryld
2007-10-10 19:09:15 UTC
Permalink
it works well with a high resolution scanner that has the option of
scanning negatives and transparencies and provides light from
above.I use an Epson Perfection V700, which costs just over 300
pounds in the UK
You *can* obtain quite useful results with a considerably cheaper
scanner. I have made very legible scans using a CanoScan 4200F. It
only scans up to 3200 ppi, but it's often adequate.
--
Regards
Lars Erik Bryld
William Kirk
2007-10-11 09:46:45 UTC
Permalink
Thanks Lars. I had not realised that scanners designed to cope with film as
well as ordinary documents were now so cheap. The CanoScan 4200F only costs
about 60 to 80 pounds in the UK (about 90 to 115 euros). I assume the F in
4200F signifies that it can scan film.

Has anyone had any luck scanning microfiche of printed/typed material with
optical character recognition (e.g. typed monumental inscription
transcripts)? Some commercial pdf copies of old published transcripts have
very poor OCR and are hardly worth searching because so many words have been
misinterpreted, so I am not optimistic.

William
Post by Lars Erik Bryld
it works well with a high resolution scanner that has the option of
scanning negatives and transparencies and provides light from
above.I use an Epson Perfection V700, which costs just over 300
pounds in the UK
You *can* obtain quite useful results with a considerably cheaper
scanner. I have made very legible scans using a CanoScan 4200F. It
only scans up to 3200 ppi, but it's often adequate.
--
Regards
Lars Erik Bryld
Dave Hinz
2007-10-11 11:58:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by William Kirk
Thanks Lars. I had not realised that scanners designed to cope with film as
well as ordinary documents were now so cheap. The CanoScan 4200F only costs
about 60 to 80 pounds in the UK (about 90 to 115 euros). I assume the F in
4200F signifies that it can scan film.
As time goes on, good scanners keep getting cheaper. My Epson 3200 DPI
film scanner works OK for written but not so good for technical
microfiche of typed characters (engineering drawings, etc).
Post by William Kirk
Has anyone had any luck scanning microfiche of printed/typed material with
optical character recognition (e.g. typed monumental inscription
transcripts)? Some commercial pdf copies of old published transcripts have
very poor OCR and are hardly worth searching because so many words have been
misinterpreted, so I am not optimistic.
OCR is one of those things that seems like would be easy to get good
but, it doesn't seem to be getting there. I'd rather have an image of
the type sampled as well as you can, to give me the best chance of
reading it. Takes up more room to store but, storage is cheap these
days.

Raw scans in TIFF format take a lot more room than .jpg but, it's not a
lossy format like jpg is.
Mike Williams
2007-10-11 12:31:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dave Hinz
Raw scans in TIFF format take a lot more room than .jpg but, it's not a
lossy format like jpg is.
You might consider PNG format. It's not lossy, is reasonably compact
particularly when compared to uncompressed-TIFF, and is far more widely
supported than compressed-TIFF.
--
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure
Dave Hinz
2007-10-12 03:23:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Williams
Post by Dave Hinz
Raw scans in TIFF format take a lot more room than .jpg but, it's not a
lossy format like jpg is.
You might consider PNG format. It's not lossy, is reasonably compact
particularly when compared to uncompressed-TIFF, and is far more widely
supported than compressed-TIFF.
I use PNG often, just not for archival purposes. TIFF for archives, PNG
or JPG for webpages when size of images actually matters. And, with
ImageMagick (free anywhere, and standard on most or all *nix distros
these days), format support is pretty good and interchangable.

Loading...